top of page
  • Writer's pictureS G

Justice for Women's Rights in a Post-Roe Landscape: A Necessary State-by-State Battle




By Eleanor Bader

One year after the landmark decision of Roe v. Wade was overturned, we find ourselves at a crossroads in the battle for women's rights. The Dobbs decision, which led to a seismic shift in abortion laws across fourteen states, has been met with a spectrum of reactions. As I read the article, We Are in Survival Mode’: How the End of Roe v. Wade Changed Abortion Activism by Eleanor Bader, I couldn’t help thinking about the important question that is being considered as we are successfully changing reproductive rights in some states but not as a nation. The article posed the question “is that enough?”  So let’s dive in...

Some view the state-level efforts to preserve abortion rights as a silver lining, others as a mere distraction. But when federal action seems elusive, I believe state laws become the frontlines for securing rights that can be directly influenced by the will of the local population.

The overturning of Roe has undoubtedly cast a shadow over the nation, but it has also ignited a fervent drive towards securing justice for women's rights, state by state. This approach, while it does risk creating a patchwork of rights across the country, empowers communities to act within their means to protect their autonomy. It acknowledges the political reality that federal laws are challenging to pass and often do not reflect the will of the people as precisely as state legislation can.

The strategy of embedding the right to abortion into state constitutions has proven effective in places like California, Ohio, Michigan, and Vermont. These victories demonstrate a commitment to safeguarding reproductive rights at a local level, offering a blueprint for other states to follow. The mobilization of pro-choice advocates, who have successfully leveraged ballot initiatives and referendums, signifies a winning strategy that respects the democratic process and empowers voters.

Critics argue that this state-by-state fight lacks a national vision, fearing normalization of disparate access to abortion services. However, in a climate where federal protections are stripped away, I believe that state measures stand as the immediate defense against the curtailment of rights. Indeed, the fight for justice in women's rights demands a pragmatic approach, one that adapts to the terrain of the present political landscape.

This battle is not abstract—it has real-life implications for countless women. The National Network of Abortion Funds and other organizations are tirelessly working to mitigate the consequences of restrictive laws, providing practical support to those in need. Their work underscores the tangible effects of policies and the urgency of action.

The contentious debates in states like Florida, where abortion rights hang in the balance, are a testament to the significance of state-level engagement. The efforts of thousands of volunteers collecting signatures to challenge restrictive laws demonstrate a grassroots commitment to reproductive freedom. It's a reflection of democracy in action, where citizens rally to influence the policies that directly affect their lives.

In the face of adversities, the pro-choice movement remains undeterred, prepared to combat misinformation and defend the truth about the scope of proposed amendments. The focus remains clear: to ensure access to healthcare and to fight for the rights of women and girls in every state.

While we work towards a more unified national stance on women's rights, the state-by-state battles are not just stopgap measures—they are essential fronts in the fight for justice. They represent the determination of people across the nation to pursue justice wherever and however possible, shaping the political landscape one state at a time. The pursuit of justice, especially in matters of such personal autonomy, must be relentless and unwavering, regardless of the arena in which it unfolds.
1 view0 comments

Comments


bottom of page