top of page
  • Writer's pictureS G

The Age-Old Tradition of Old Men Dictating Women's Choices Continues

In a recent sneaky maneuver, a Republican-led House panel has advanced a 2024 budget bill with riders targeting the accessibility of the abortion drug mifepristone. By aiming to revoke vital FDA approvals that allowed this drug to be more readily accessible, they are aiming to chip away at women's reproductive rights, particularly those of women in rural areas and those who can't access in-person visits.

It’s a classic tale of control, hidden beneath layers of legislative text, political maneuvering, and purported concerns for public safety. The subtext is clear: old men clinging to antiquated beliefs believe they know better than women what should be done with their own bodies.

Firstly, it’s disheartening to think that in 2023, women still need to fight for autonomy over their bodies. The advancements made by the FDA were not just about making abortion more accessible; it was about leveling the playing field and ensuring that every woman, regardless of her location or circumstances, could access the healthcare she needed.

But instead of embracing progress, there seems to be a deliberate effort to move backward. Why would a budget bill, which ideally should prioritize the nation's finances, be stealthily employed to push an anti-abortion agenda? This tactic not only undermines the democratic process but also highlights the desperate measures some are willing to employ to curtail women's rights.

The desire of a predominantly male political faction to control the reproductive choices of women speaks to a deeper, more troubling issue. It’s not just about mifepristone or abortion; it’s about power, autonomy, and equality. It’s about a segment of our society that cannot stomach the idea of women having equal rights, let alone control over their own bodies.

When men in power make such moves, it suggests an intrinsic need to assert dominance, reminiscent of older societal norms where women were seen as the 'weaker' sex, needing guidance and direction. It’s no surprise then that such provisions are buried in complex budget bills, a move that is as cunning as it is cowardly.

Rep. Rosa DeLauro’s strong opposition to these riders showcases that there are voices of reason amidst the political chaos, voices that understand the importance of upholding women's rights in the name of public health and personal freedom.

What is equally concerning are the other "poison pills" in this budget bill that aim to thwart measures reducing sodium in foods or nicotine levels in cigarettes. Such proposals further demonstrate a disregard for public health in favor of appeasing certain industries or pushing personal agendas.

It's essential to ask, why are we still having these debates? In a world where we are pushing boundaries, breaking glass ceilings, and advocating for equality, why are women's rights still on the chopping block? And more importantly, why is the narrative so often controlled by those who will never experience the profound and personal dilemmas women face?

As the bill moves to the full appropriations committee, one can only hope that clarity and reason prevail, that women's rights are upheld, and that we can finally move beyond the age-old tradition of men dictating choices they will never have to make.

1 view0 comments


bottom of page